Real owners lean toward the MXR Carbon Copy: 71% of 31 owners recommend it, vs 43% of 70 for the CS-3 Compression Sustainer.
Verdicts aggregated from Reddit, enthusiast forums, and YouTube owner comments — affiliate reviews excluded. Sample sizes differ; judge accordingly. How we score
“The CS-3 is what I want my compressor pedal to sound like. You can get that real squashy sound it's what you're looking for. Mine did eventually fail though, that bummed me out.”— MLoxxer on Reddit
“Great pedal - somehow less noisy than pricier compressors but not as squishy, although it does the clanky compression very well. Also great as a boost on lower compression levels.”— procraffinator on Reddit
“I used a Cs3 on my board for like 6 months and really wanted to like it but to me it's a piece of junk for the same reasons you said. Noise everywhere if you surpass the middle of the knobs.”— carlitox3 on Reddit
Real owners lean toward the MXR Carbon Copy: 71% of 31 owners recommend it, vs 43% of 70 for the CS-3 Compression Sustainer.
Owners point the CS-3 Compression Sustainer at players who want compression they can hear working, with long sustain, rather than an invisible peak trimmer, and anyone tightening up clean or palm-muted rhythm parts so they sit better in a band.
Owners point the MXR Carbon Copy at players wanting warm, natural analog delay, and guitarists after slapback and short echo settings.
The most-cited downside of the CS-3 Compression Sustainer is noise climbs with the sustain control, and owners repeatedly report hiss once the knobs pass the middle of their travel, worse with drive or fuzz in the chain. For the MXR Carbon Copy, it's underwhelming compared to alternatives for a minority of owners, some felt it didn't outperform other delays (like the analog settings on an FB/FB4) and ended up returning or replacing it.