Real owners lean toward the Baltoro 65: 91% of 43 owners recommend it, vs 77% of 311 for the Osprey Exos 58.
Verdicts aggregated from Reddit, enthusiast forums, and YouTube owner comments — affiliate reviews excluded. Sample sizes differ; judge accordingly. How we score
“LOVE THIS PACK!”— Adam Parker on Trailspace
“I LOVE this pack.”— Gary Bowen on Trailspace
“The Baltoro 65 absolutely sucks. It is way too heavy. A strap broke on mine making the hiking more difficult than it needed to be.”— Chicagohiker2020 on Reddit
“For the past 2 years I've been using an Osprey Exos 58. It's lightweight, but can handle a good sized load.”— Dr_WolfRyder on Reddit
“If you like Osprey, an Exos 58 L is about 2.5 lbs., has the nice suspension and ride, carries weight well when you have to, and a bear can will fit.”— see_blue on Reddit
“Yep, Osprey Exos 58 bruised and rubbed raw a half dollar+ size spot on each hip bone. No amount of adjusting stopped this.”— Rocko9999 on Reddit
Real owners lean toward the Baltoro 65: 91% of 43 owners recommend it, vs 77% of 311 for the Osprey Exos 58.
Owners point the Baltoro 65 at multi-day backpackers hauling 50+ lbs who want a heavy load carried comfortably, and thru-hikers wanting a durable pack that holds up for years without failing.
Owners point the Osprey Exos 58 at multiday and thru-hikers wanting a light framed pack, and hikers who sweat and want a ventilated mesh back.
The most-cited downside of the Baltoro 65 is noticeably heavy compared to other packs. For the Osprey Exos 58, it's uncomfortable above roughly 35 lbs.