Real owners lean toward the Asics Gel-Nimbus 28: 42% of 45 owners recommend it, vs 35% of 34 for the Adidas Ultraboost 5.
Verdicts aggregated from Reddit, enthusiast forums, and YouTube owner comments — affiliate reviews excluded. Sample sizes differ; judge accordingly. How we score
“Say what you want about the design, these are insanely comfortable shoes. IMO look better in person.”— ridukosennin on Reddit
“I have Allbirds and UB 3.0s and I can say definitively my UBs are far more comfortable for me. It’s a treat to wear them haha”— SunriseMoon on Reddit
“Anyone have the issue of the footbed moving around in their Ultraboost 19s? It makes mine nearly unwearable. (It slides back constantly. No matter how tight or loose they are.)”— Easy-Lucky-Free on Reddit
“the second I step back into hokas or the nimbus my feet are fine again”— Jumpy-Daddy5809 on Reddit
“Great so far and a huge cushion upgrade from my older winflos. Great upper. Overall great for long easy runs.”— Forsaken_Ducky on Reddit
“I tried the Nimbus earlier this week and found them to be extremely soft at the metatarsal head”— orbitolinid on Reddit
Real owners lean toward the Asics Gel-Nimbus 28: 42% of 45 owners recommend it, vs 35% of 34 for the Adidas Ultraboost 5.
Owners point the Adidas Ultraboost 5 at casual runners and walkers who won't rack up serious weekly mileage, and distance runners who prioritize long-run comfort over sprint responsiveness.
Owners point the Asics Gel-Nimbus 28 at long-distance and marathon runners wanting max cushioning for easy/recovery runs, and runners who also want a comfy daily walking or standing-all-day shoe.
The most-cited downside of the Adidas Ultraboost 5 is sole cracking, peeling, and premature breakdown, sometimes within just 3-6 months of purchase. For the Asics Gel-Nimbus 28, it's a hole wears through the upper near the toe/toenail area, reported by multiple owners across the 25, 26, and 27 generations as a recurring defect.