Real owners lean toward the ASICS Novablast 5: 41% of 145 owners recommend it, vs 35% of 34 for the Adidas Ultraboost 5.
Verdicts aggregated from Reddit, enthusiast forums, and YouTube owner comments — affiliate reviews excluded. Sample sizes differ; judge accordingly. How we score
“Say what you want about the design, these are insanely comfortable shoes. IMO look better in person.”— ridukosennin on Reddit
“I have Allbirds and UB 3.0s and I can say definitively my UBs are far more comfortable for me. It’s a treat to wear them haha”— SunriseMoon on Reddit
“Anyone have the issue of the footbed moving around in their Ultraboost 19s? It makes mine nearly unwearable. (It slides back constantly. No matter how tight or loose they are.)”— Easy-Lucky-Free on Reddit
“Look at that Nova Blast, Bouncy yet Stable. And the comfort level.”— @andrewmcallister3903 on YouTube
“I just bought novablast 5. So far, its good for me. Bounce and good energy return. Satisfied”— @alihafiz13 on YouTube
“novablast has way too much cushion for me. too soft for my taste.”— @MrJoshbono5 on YouTube
Real owners lean toward the ASICS Novablast 5: 41% of 145 owners recommend it, vs 35% of 34 for the Adidas Ultraboost 5.
Owners point the Adidas Ultraboost 5 at casual runners and walkers who won't rack up serious weekly mileage, and distance runners who prioritize long-run comfort over sprint responsiveness.
Owners point the ASICS Novablast 5 at neutral runners wanting a soft, bouncy daily trainer, and easy days, long runs and beginners building mileage.
The most-cited downside of the Adidas Ultraboost 5 is sole cracking, peeling, and premature breakdown, sometimes within just 3-6 months of purchase. For the ASICS Novablast 5, it's bounce and midsole die early (durability).