Real owners rate these about evenly: 42% of 45 Asics Gel-Nimbus 28 owners recommend it, vs 45% of 67 for the Brooks Ghost 16.
Verdicts aggregated from Reddit, enthusiast forums, and YouTube owner comments — affiliate reviews excluded. Sample sizes differ; judge accordingly. How we score
“the second I step back into hokas or the nimbus my feet are fine again”— Jumpy-Daddy5809 on Reddit
“Great so far and a huge cushion upgrade from my older winflos. Great upper. Overall great for long easy runs.”— Forsaken_Ducky on Reddit
“I tried the Nimbus earlier this week and found them to be extremely soft at the metatarsal head”— orbitolinid on Reddit
Real owners rate these about evenly: 42% of 45 Asics Gel-Nimbus 28 owners recommend it, vs 45% of 67 for the Brooks Ghost 16.
Owners point the Asics Gel-Nimbus 28 at long-distance and marathon runners wanting max cushioning for easy/recovery runs, and runners who also want a comfy daily walking or standing-all-day shoe.
Owners point the Brooks Ghost 16 at runners wanting a plush, supportive daily trainer, and people on their feet all day needing cushioning.
The most-cited downside of the Asics Gel-Nimbus 28 is a hole wears through the upper near the toe/toenail area, reported by multiple owners across the 25, 26, and 27 generations as a recurring defect. For the Brooks Ghost 16, it's causes blisters, sore knees or arch pain.