Real owners rate these about evenly: 74% of 77 X-T5 owners recommend it, vs 76% of 132 for the a6700.
Verdicts aggregated from Reddit, enthusiast forums, and YouTube owner comments — affiliate reviews excluded. Sample sizes differ; judge accordingly. How we score
“Did some shooting with my X-T5 in kyoto and it was pissing rain. Between shooting I kept it tucked under my arm and surprisingly didnt have any issues afterwards! I was pleasantly surprised!!”— Idontworkhere67 on Reddit
“it performed really good and even though it was pretty cold out the battery was quite good”— Severe_Cranberry5657 on Reddit
“I got a Fuji xt5 and it was 1. Noticably heavy and the grip inadequate to make handling nice. 2. The autofocus was comically bad. I returned it and got an OM-1”— Tak_Galaman on Reddit
“They make my A6700 and ZV-E1 record forever”— @jntechreview on YouTube
“I've been shooting with sony in desert and glaciers for over 10yrs never had any heating issues”— @EstebanAi on YouTube
“That fan buys me an extra 30min with the a6700 if lucky, and the fan fully charged. Nowhere near the fx line”— @elaroussinoureddine9801 on YouTube
Real owners rate these about evenly: 74% of 77 X-T5 owners recommend it, vs 76% of 132 for the a6700.
Owners point the X-T5 at travel and everyday shooters who want one capable body, and photographers who like dedicated dials and a tilting screen.
Owners point the a6700 at travel shooters wanting a small, light APS-C body, and wildlife, birds, pets, and motorsport needing fast AI autofocus.
The most-cited downside of the X-T5 is autofocus falls behind Sony, Canon, and Nikon for fast subjects, and some owners miss shots. For the a6700, it's overheats during high frame-rate video.