Real owners lean toward the Galaxy Watch Ultra: 75% of 16 owners recommend it, vs 68% of 75 for the Garmin Forerunner 970.
Verdicts aggregated from Reddit, enthusiast forums, and YouTube owner comments — affiliate reviews excluded. Sample sizes differ; judge accordingly. How we score
“I have been enjoying my watch very much although the battery drains pretty quickly”— @jesuscervantesj82 on YouTube
“I thought pictures of it were ugly, but when I saw it in the metal...wow!”— @myfakeguuglaccount on YouTube
“Had it for couple of a days and we just didnt clicked so I sold it.”— @0ISthisIT0 on YouTube
Real owners lean toward the Galaxy Watch Ultra: 75% of 16 owners recommend it, vs 68% of 75 for the Garmin Forerunner 970.
Owners point the Garmin Forerunner 970 at runners wanting a lightweight, full-featured GPS watch, and small-wrist users needing a thin, comfortable watch.
Owners point the Galaxy Watch Ultra at samsung/Android phone owners wanting a rugged, premium-feeling smartwatch with WearOS features, and outdoor and adventure users who value a bright always-on display and tough build over ultralight design.
The most-cited downside of the Garmin Forerunner 970 is ghost touches and an oversensitive touchscreen, sometimes unusable until disabled. For the Galaxy Watch Ultra, it's battery life is the most common complaint, with many owners getting only 1-2.5 days per charge (some as low as 20-30 hours) despite Samsung's 2-4 day claims.