Smartwatches · owner-verdict comparison

Garmin Venu 3 vs Vivoactive 5: what real owners say

Real owners lean toward the Garmin Venu 3: 69% of 256 owners recommend it, vs 55% of 56 for the Vivoactive 5.

Verdicts aggregated from Reddit, enthusiast forums, and YouTube owner comments — affiliate reviews excluded. Sample sizes differ; judge accordingly. How we score

Garmin Venu 3

69%of 256 owners recommend
69% recommend · 13% neutral · 18% don't
Owners praise
  • Exceptional multi-day battery life
  • Accurate HR, SpO2 and GPS
  • Rich free tracking, no subscription
Owners complain about
  • Unreliable, inconsistent sleep tracking
  • Limited smart features versus Apple
  • Notification and connectivity glitches
Full owner report →

Vivoactive 5

55%of 56 owners recommend
55% recommend · 27% neutral · 18% don't
Full owner report →

What Garmin Venu 3 owners say

“Battery time is enough for me to change from Samsung/ Apple.”
— @waynehighfield2094 on YouTube
“Great watch even if I'm 80 years old. I still love my gadgets, like my Venu 3. Very comfortable and easy to use.”
— @Billcarls1 on YouTube
“Garmin's pricing is insane to me. $450 for plastic watch.”
— @MaxCaud on YouTube

What Vivoactive 5 owners say

“I'm very happy with my vivoactive 4 and will likely ask for the vivoactive 5 for Christmas.”
— @tinwhiskerSC on YouTube
“This watch seems like amazing value and a great choice for the more casually gym-go'er/runner/moderately active person”
— @martinjrgensen8377 on YouTube
“So disappointed they removed Stairs. I feel like I need to stick with the Vivoactive 4 for this reason.”
— @dianacrabtree6546 on YouTube