Real owners rate these about evenly: 91% of 43 Baltoro 65 owners recommend it, vs 88% of 25 for the Gregory Zulu 55.
Verdicts aggregated from Reddit, enthusiast forums, and YouTube owner comments — affiliate reviews excluded. Sample sizes differ; judge accordingly. How we score
“LOVE THIS PACK!”— Adam Parker on Trailspace
“I LOVE this pack.”— Gary Bowen on Trailspace
“The Baltoro 65 absolutely sucks. It is way too heavy. A strap broke on mine making the hiking more difficult than it needed to be.”— Chicagohiker2020 on Reddit
“Got a Zulu 55 early spring and have taken it on a number of 2-3 day backpack camping adventures.....love the pack!!!!”— @va3ks on YouTube
“is an excellent pack which I use for almost all of my overnight trips these days”— WeAreThePizza on Reddit
“Gregory's decision to stop including rain covers is such a dirty shrinkflation move. They took out the bungee sunglasses holder on the shoulder straps too.”— @GetUpTheMountains on YouTube
Real owners rate these about evenly: 91% of 43 Baltoro 65 owners recommend it, vs 88% of 25 for the Gregory Zulu 55.
Owners point the Baltoro 65 at multi-day backpackers hauling 50+ lbs who want a heavy load carried comfortably, and thru-hikers wanting a durable pack that holds up for years without failing.
Owners point the Gregory Zulu 55 at backpackers who prioritize load comfort over minimal weight, and multi-day and overnight trips with heavier loads.
The most-cited downside of the Baltoro 65 is noticeably heavy compared to other packs. For the Gregory Zulu 55, it's heavier than ultralight packs.