Hiking Backpacks · owner-verdict comparison
Rook 65 vs Talon 22: what real owners say Real owners rate these about evenly: 73% of 11 Rook 65 owners recommend it, vs 77% of 417 for the Talon 22.
Verdicts aggregated from Reddit, enthusiast forums, and YouTube owner comments — affiliate reviews excluded. Sample sizes differ; judge accordingly. How we score
73%of 11 owners recommend
73% recommend · 27% neutral · 0% don't
Owners praise
Praised as a reliable, well-made bag overall — owners repeatedly say it simply works great and they like it Comfortable to carry, including on short and multi-day hikes Full owner report → 77%of 417 owners recommend
77% recommend · 17% neutral · 6% don't
Owners praise
Exceptionally comfortable to wear, even loaded and on longer days Extremely durable, with many owners reporting 7-12+ years of hard daily or trail use before any real wear shows Ideal size and versatility for day hikes, commuting, cycling, and travel/carry-on use Owners complain about
Too small for anything beyond a single day out; owners routinely outgrow the 22L volume and wish they'd sized up Difficult or impossible to fit a 2-3L hydration bladder, a problem owners say got worse on the newer redesigned version Stiff, hard lumbar/hip-pad area causes back discomfort or poor fit for some wearers Full owner report → Which should you buy? Get the Rook 65 if
✓ Short-to-multi-day hikers wanting a simple, comfy, bomb-proof bucket pack ✓ Hot-climate backpackers who value the ventilated mesh back panel ✓ Budget-conscious buyers who want a reliable, no-frills hauler Skip it if
Long-distance or thru-hikers wanting more organized, easy-access pockets Anyone needing a more water-resistant fabric than the stock material Get the Talon 22 if
✓ Day hikers wanting a comfortable, lightweight pack for 5-9 hour trail days ✓ Commuters and travelers who want one bag for laptop, gear, and daily carry ✓ Owners who want durability, some report 7-12+ years of daily abuse with no failures ✓ Cyclists and scramblers needing a stable, body-hugging pack that carries loads comfortably Skip it if
Anyone needing to fit a 2-3L water bladder, many say it barely fits or won't fit Multi-day or heavy-load hikers, several found the 22L volume too limiting and sized up What Rook 65 owners say “I find it a great bag in general but the squeaking can be very annoying.”— randomcheesecake555 on
Reddit “I do like the simplicity of the bag and the air vent mesh against your back is really nice for the hot days.”— DiscountJunior6884 on
Reddit What Talon 22 owners say “I found this system works really well.” “it'd still be perfectly comfortable aside from the weight.” “love is my day hiking pack, a Talon 22, because of how it never quite seems to fit what I need.” Rook 65 vs Talon 22: frequently asked questions Is the Rook 65 or the Talon 22 better? Real owners rate these about evenly: 73% of 11 Rook 65 owners recommend it, vs 77% of 417 for the Talon 22.
Who should get the Rook 65? Owners point the Rook 65 at short-to-multi-day hikers wanting a simple, comfy, bomb-proof bucket pack, and hot-climate backpackers who value the ventilated mesh back panel.
Who should get the Talon 22? Owners point the Talon 22 at day hikers wanting a comfortable, lightweight pack for 5-9 hour trail days, and commuters and travelers who want one bag for laptop, gear, and daily carry.
The web's most robust real-owner review aggregator — real opinions from people who actually own the product, every verdict sourced, nothing paid.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Some links here are affiliate links — if you buy through one we may earn a small commission, at no extra cost to you. It never affects our scores, rankings, or which products we cover.
© 2026 ownersreview — independent, ad-free, sourced