Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 DC DN

“The problem with this lens is that I don't use my other lenses anymore.”

“After few months of using this cute little sigma I went back to sigma trio”

“Good option, but I'd still prefer the Tamron for the extra reach and stabilization.”

“I love that small form factor, but they could've put a little more emphasis on image quality and it would've been irresistible deal!”

“Dayum, for $549 that's a pretty good deal!”

“It can be very annoying if you mix this lens with Sony / Tamron lenses.”

“This would have been perfect for me if it had stabilization :-(”

“Looks like a very nice lens. But I'd choose the Tamron over it again, not so much because of the bit more wideangle but the 20mm more tele.”

“it has easily become my go-to lens for so much”

“I had tried the Sigma, and it is compact and light, but ended up settling on the Tamron 17-70mm.”

“can now be usable for wedding and event photography!”

“Too short. 17-70 2.8 just makes more sense to me.”

“That's a good start in my eyes”

“was not convinced either. Sent back.”

“I wish Sigma had made a version of this lens with image stabilisation.”

“I still can't believe how sharp it is for a zoom”

“without stabilizer for me it is also rejected because the bodies of the sony series a6xxx are all not stabilized”

“makes it hard to recommend it as an everyday lens given "every day" means a lot of rain in my case”

“I completely understand why you criticize these things, but I thought it might be valuable to note this from my noob perspective for any new buyers coming to this video wondering if these things would affect them and I'd say they don't, it's all just about what you're used to.”

“Who gave Sigma the courage to charge a high price for such a low quality lens?”

“Wow this lense is truly capable and it fits so nicely with an APS-C camera. It's crisp, the bokeh is amazing”

“Great lens, this will be a huge step for Sony APS-C. Nevertheless I will keep my Sony 16-55 because for me it makes a significant difference to have 16mm instead of 18.”

“I expected better image quality on f/2.8, Tamron 17-70 is better option.”

“Still awesome size”