Running shoes · owner-verdict comparison

Adidas Adizero Boston 13 vs Asics Gel-Nimbus 28: what real owners say

Real owners lean toward the Adidas Adizero Boston 13: 55% of 309 owners recommend it, vs 42% of 45 for the Asics Gel-Nimbus 28.

Verdicts aggregated from Reddit, enthusiast forums, and YouTube owner comments — affiliate reviews excluded. Sample sizes differ; judge accordingly. How we score

Adidas Adizero Boston 13

55%of 309 owners recommend
55% recommend · 20% neutral · 25% don't
Owners praise
  • Much-improved upper over the 12
  • Versatile do-everything trainer
  • Great for tempo and faster paces
Owners complain about
  • Too firm for easy, slow long runs
  • Laces and lockdown are fiddly
  • Narrow, tapered toe box
Full owner report →

Asics Gel-Nimbus 28

42%of 45 owners recommend
42% recommend · 14% neutral · 44% don't
Owners praise
  • Plush, high-cushion feel that owners love for easy, long, and recovery runs, several describe it as 'walking on cloud'
  • Relieves foot pain and soreness better than some other cushioned brands (Hoka, New Balance) for owners who struggle with those
Owners complain about
  • A hole wears through the upper near the toe/toenail area, reported by multiple owners across the 25, 26, and 27 generations as a recurring defect
  • Some owners have switched away to rivals like the Vomero Plus, Asics Superblast, or New Balance 1080v14, finding the Nimbus less responsive or appealing in comparison
  • A subset of owners report painful hot spots, an overly soft metatarsal area, or shin splints, for some, Asics as a brand worsened foot pain
Full owner report →

Which should you buy?

Get the Adidas Adizero Boston 13 if
  • Runners doing tempo and faster workouts
  • Those wanting one versatile do-it-all trainer
  • Runners who like a firm, stable ride
  • Heavier runners needing stability and durability
Skip it if
  • Runners wanting soft cushioning for slow long runs
  • Wide feet or those needing a roomy toe box
Get the Asics Gel-Nimbus 28 if
  • Long-distance and marathon runners wanting max cushioning for easy/recovery runs
  • Runners who also want a comfy daily walking or standing-all-day shoe
  • People whose feet hurt in firmer trainers and need extra plush support
  • Runners building a rotation who want a dedicated soft recovery-day shoe
Skip it if
  • Runners wanting a responsive, energetic ride for faster-paced training
  • High-mileage runners bothered by recurring upper holes or quick sole wear

What Adidas Adizero Boston 13 owners say

I love the 12 so much I will choose the 13 over EVO SL any time
@olsa2k on YouTube
So i bought the Boston 13 and like it much more.
@marcojo111 on YouTube
i found the 12’s. WAY too hard.
@neilhulme8426 on YouTube

What Asics Gel-Nimbus 28 owners say

the second I step back into hokas or the nimbus my feet are fine again
Jumpy-Daddy5809 on Reddit
Great so far and a huge cushion upgrade from my older winflos. Great upper. Overall great for long easy runs.
Forsaken_Ducky on Reddit
I tried the Nimbus earlier this week and found them to be extremely soft at the metatarsal head
orbitolinid on Reddit

Adidas Adizero Boston 13 vs Asics Gel-Nimbus 28: frequently asked questions

Is the Adidas Adizero Boston 13 or the Asics Gel-Nimbus 28 better?

Real owners lean toward the Adidas Adizero Boston 13: 55% of 309 owners recommend it, vs 42% of 45 for the Asics Gel-Nimbus 28.

Who should get the Adidas Adizero Boston 13?

Owners point the Adidas Adizero Boston 13 at runners doing tempo and faster workouts, and those wanting one versatile do-it-all trainer.

Who should get the Asics Gel-Nimbus 28?

Owners point the Asics Gel-Nimbus 28 at long-distance and marathon runners wanting max cushioning for easy/recovery runs, and runners who also want a comfy daily walking or standing-all-day shoe.

What do owners complain about?

The most-cited downside of the Adidas Adizero Boston 13 is too firm for easy, slow long runs. For the Asics Gel-Nimbus 28, it's a hole wears through the upper near the toe/toenail area, reported by multiple owners across the 25, 26, and 27 generations as a recurring defect.