Real owners lean toward the Brooks Ghost 17: 82% of 11 owners recommend it, vs 42% of 45 for the Asics Gel-Nimbus 28.
Verdicts aggregated from Reddit, enthusiast forums, and YouTube owner comments — affiliate reviews excluded. Sample sizes differ; judge accordingly. How we score
“the second I step back into hokas or the nimbus my feet are fine again”— Jumpy-Daddy5809 on Reddit
“Great so far and a huge cushion upgrade from my older winflos. Great upper. Overall great for long easy runs.”— Forsaken_Ducky on Reddit
“I tried the Nimbus earlier this week and found them to be extremely soft at the metatarsal head”— orbitolinid on Reddit
Real owners lean toward the Brooks Ghost 17: 82% of 11 owners recommend it, vs 42% of 45 for the Asics Gel-Nimbus 28.
Owners point the Asics Gel-Nimbus 28 at long-distance and marathon runners wanting max cushioning for easy/recovery runs, and runners who also want a comfy daily walking or standing-all-day shoe.
Owners point the Brooks Ghost 17 at daily trainers logging most of their weekly miles, and half-marathon runners wanting stable cushioning.
The most-cited downside of the Asics Gel-Nimbus 28 is a hole wears through the upper near the toe/toenail area, reported by multiple owners across the 25, 26, and 27 generations as a recurring defect. For the Brooks Ghost 17, it's runs a bit heavy, so owners suggest a faster shoe for racing or speed sessions.