Real owners lean toward the Canon EOS R6 Mark II: 88% of 97 owners recommend it, vs 58% of 38 for the Osmo Pocket 4.
Verdicts aggregated from Reddit, enthusiast forums, and YouTube owner comments — affiliate reviews excluded. Sample sizes differ; judge accordingly. How we score
“Had this camera for a year. It’s at the feature point where 99% of photographers will not need more than this”— @andrewwelchphotographer on YouTube
“I have this camera. Been using it professionally for a year! It's a beast!”— @PaulStrople on YouTube
“Lack of third-party lens support is an instant dealbreaker for me.”— @steviewonderisnotblind5833 on YouTube
“The unit looks good, feels well made, and the camera connected to the Mimo app without any hiccups. It’s my first dedicated camera and it’s been nothing but awesome.”— Limppyy on Reddit
“Tried the pocket 4 and didnt look back. Honestly, you tend to develop bad habits of trigger happy shooting when youre on the iphone. Hence, the jump to pocket 4 was a breath of fresh air.”— SourStrawberry12629 on Reddit
“I just got it and is ABSOLUTE BS. In no world a company should require you to download their spyware app to activate or register when you can do it online. It overheats as well”— DependentNewt7482 on Reddit
Real owners lean toward the Canon EOS R6 Mark II: 88% of 97 owners recommend it, vs 58% of 38 for the Osmo Pocket 4.
Owners point the Canon EOS R6 Mark II at hybrid shooters wanting strong photo and video, and sports and action shooters needing high keeper rates.
Owners point the Osmo Pocket 4 at travelers and walking or street video shooters, and buyers moving from phone video to a dedicated camera.
The most-cited downside of the Canon EOS R6 Mark II is video stabilization issues: IBIS "jello," and you can't disable IBIS while keeping lens IS. For the Osmo Pocket 4, it's settings and D-Log take effort, and some owners find the color oversaturated out of the box.