Cameras · owner-verdict comparison

Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs a6700: what real owners say

Real owners lean toward the Canon EOS R6 Mark II: 88% of 97 owners recommend it, vs 76% of 132 for the a6700.

Verdicts aggregated from Reddit, enthusiast forums, and YouTube owner comments — affiliate reviews excluded. Sample sizes differ; judge accordingly. How we score

Canon EOS R6 Mark II

88%of 97 owners recommend
88% recommend · 6% neutral · 6% don't
Owners praise
  • Excellent autofocus and subject/eye tracking that rarely misses a shot, even for fast-moving sports
  • Owners repeatedly call it an outstanding, best-in-class camera that blows the competition out of the water
  • Great low-light performance, needing far less light for clean, detailed exposures
Owners complain about
  • Video stabilization issues: IBIS "jello," and you can't disable IBIS while keeping lens IS
  • Video recording limitations like no ALL-I codec and micro-jitter in 4K 60 slow motion
  • Ergonomics and in-hand feel are a step down from the original R for some
Full owner report →

a6700

76%of 132 owners recommend
76% recommend · 7% neutral · 17% don't
Owners praise
  • Exceptional AI autofocus and subject tracking
  • Amazing image quality and colors
  • Compact, lightweight body
Owners complain about
  • Overheats during high frame-rate video
  • Weak low-light performance for a crop sensor
Full owner report →

Which should you buy?

Get the Canon EOS R6 Mark II if
  • ✓Hybrid shooters wanting strong photo and video
  • ✓Sports and action shooters needing high keeper rates
  • ✓Low-light photographers wanting cleaner exposures
  • ✓Handheld video relying on in-body stabilization
Skip it if
  • Videographers needing ALL-I and clean 4K slow-motion
  • Shooters bothered by IBIS 'jello' distortion
Get the a6700 if
  • ✓Travel shooters wanting a small, light APS-C body
  • ✓Wildlife, birds, pets, and motorsport needing fast AI autofocus
  • ✓First-mirrorless buyers who don't need full frame
  • ✓Hybrid shooters mixing stills and 4K video
Skip it if
  • Heavy low-light shooters wanting full-frame cleanliness
  • Pros needing dual card slots for backup

What Canon EOS R6 Mark II owners say

“Had this camera for a year. It’s at the feature point where 99% of photographers will not need more than this”
— @andrewwelchphotographer on YouTube
“I have this camera. Been using it professionally for a year! It's a beast!”
— @PaulStrople on YouTube
“Lack of third-party lens support is an instant dealbreaker for me.”
— @steviewonderisnotblind5833 on YouTube

What a6700 owners say

“They make my A6700 and ZV-E1 record forever”
— @jntechreview on YouTube
“I've been shooting with sony in desert and glaciers for over 10yrs never had any heating issues”
— @EstebanAi on YouTube
“That fan buys me an extra 30min with the a6700 if lucky, and the fan fully charged. Nowhere near the fx line”
— @elaroussinoureddine9801 on YouTube

Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs a6700: frequently asked questions

Is the Canon EOS R6 Mark II or the a6700 better?

Real owners lean toward the Canon EOS R6 Mark II: 88% of 97 owners recommend it, vs 76% of 132 for the a6700.

Who should get the Canon EOS R6 Mark II?

Owners point the Canon EOS R6 Mark II at hybrid shooters wanting strong photo and video, and sports and action shooters needing high keeper rates.

Who should get the a6700?

Owners point the a6700 at travel shooters wanting a small, light APS-C body, and wildlife, birds, pets, and motorsport needing fast AI autofocus.

What do owners complain about?

The most-cited downside of the Canon EOS R6 Mark II is video stabilization issues: IBIS "jello," and you can't disable IBIS while keeping lens IS. For the a6700, it's overheats during high frame-rate video.