Real owners lean toward the Osmo Pocket 3: 69% of 61 owners recommend it, vs 62% of 140 for the X100VI.
Verdicts aggregated from Reddit, enthusiast forums, and YouTube owner comments — affiliate reviews excluded. Sample sizes differ; judge accordingly. How we score
“I've been very happy with the footage. A little post work and it's great. I certainly would not use it as my primary cam but for the use I described, I am happy with the investment.”— AndrewThomasPhoto on Reddit
“Often with the pocket3 it's not even worth the time to shoot in d-log and color grade. Standard is what I typically use and still looks great with a fraction of the editing effort.”— RidexSDS on Reddit
“My major complaint with the OP3 is its difficulty in handling the "blues." I'm not sure if it's a common complaint but I've been finding it hard to deal with the "blues" from all my clips actually.”— kuyand on Reddit
“I have the x100v and the beauty of it is you just get beautiful images without ever having to touch Lightroom.”— @aminbajrektarevicab on YouTube
“I enjoy shooting through a camera viewfinder and I really don't enjoy shooting from the back of my phone.”— @gohumberto on YouTube
“given the price increase, and the fact it still cant fit into jeans/pants/shorts pockets, I decided to go the GRiiiX”— @michaelhall859 on YouTube
Real owners lean toward the Osmo Pocket 3: 69% of 61 owners recommend it, vs 62% of 140 for the X100VI.
Owners point the Osmo Pocket 3 at travelers who want a camera that fits in a pocket, and vloggers and social creators, including vertical video.
Owners point the X100VI at everyday-carry shooters wanting a pocketable travel camera, and street and family photographers valuing a discreet body.
The most-cited downside of the Osmo Pocket 3 is getting good-looking footage takes careful lighting, settings, and grading, and some owners struggle with blues and shadows. For the X100VI, it's autofocus feels slow, loud and dated for video and fast subjects.