Cameras · owner-verdict comparison

Osmo Pocket 3 vs a6700: what real owners say

Real owners lean toward the a6700: 76% of 132 owners recommend it, vs 69% of 61 for the Osmo Pocket 3.

Verdicts aggregated from Reddit, enthusiast forums, and YouTube owner comments — affiliate reviews excluded. Sample sizes differ; judge accordingly. How we score

Osmo Pocket 3

69%of 61 owners recommend
69% recommend · 8% neutral · 23% don't
Owners praise
  • Footage owners describe as great for the size
  • Small enough to carry everywhere
  • Quick and easy to shoot with
Owners complain about
  • Getting good-looking footage takes careful lighting, settings, and grading, and some owners struggle with blues and shadows
  • Files pulled through the phone app are low-resolution previews, so full quality means copying from the card or by cable
  • Limited next to a dedicated camera for serious work
Full owner report →

a6700

76%of 132 owners recommend
76% recommend · 7% neutral · 17% don't
Owners praise
  • Exceptional AI autofocus and subject tracking
  • Amazing image quality and colors
  • Compact, lightweight body
Owners complain about
  • Overheats during high frame-rate video
  • Weak low-light performance for a crop sensor
Full owner report →

Which should you buy?

Get the Osmo Pocket 3 if
  • ✓Travelers who want a camera that fits in a pocket
  • ✓Vloggers and social creators, including vertical video
  • ✓Buyers moving up from a phone or action camera
  • ✓Shooters who want a quick second camera alongside a main setup
Skip it if
  • Anyone expecting finished-looking footage with no grading or care over lighting
  • Wedding or professional shoots that need a full camera and lens
Get the a6700 if
  • ✓Travel shooters wanting a small, light APS-C body
  • ✓Wildlife, birds, pets, and motorsport needing fast AI autofocus
  • ✓First-mirrorless buyers who don't need full frame
  • ✓Hybrid shooters mixing stills and 4K video
Skip it if
  • Heavy low-light shooters wanting full-frame cleanliness
  • Pros needing dual card slots for backup

What Osmo Pocket 3 owners say

“I've been very happy with the footage. A little post work and it's great. I certainly would not use it as my primary cam but for the use I described, I am happy with the investment.”
— AndrewThomasPhoto on Reddit
“Often with the pocket3 it's not even worth the time to shoot in d-log and color grade. Standard is what I typically use and still looks great with a fraction of the editing effort.”
— RidexSDS on Reddit
“My major complaint with the OP3 is its difficulty in handling the "blues." I'm not sure if it's a common complaint but I've been finding it hard to deal with the "blues" from all my clips actually.”
— kuyand on Reddit

What a6700 owners say

“They make my A6700 and ZV-E1 record forever”
— @jntechreview on YouTube
“I've been shooting with sony in desert and glaciers for over 10yrs never had any heating issues”
— @EstebanAi on YouTube
“That fan buys me an extra 30min with the a6700 if lucky, and the fan fully charged. Nowhere near the fx line”
— @elaroussinoureddine9801 on YouTube

Osmo Pocket 3 vs a6700: frequently asked questions

Is the Osmo Pocket 3 or the a6700 better?

Real owners lean toward the a6700: 76% of 132 owners recommend it, vs 69% of 61 for the Osmo Pocket 3.

Who should get the Osmo Pocket 3?

Owners point the Osmo Pocket 3 at travelers who want a camera that fits in a pocket, and vloggers and social creators, including vertical video.

Who should get the a6700?

Owners point the a6700 at travel shooters wanting a small, light APS-C body, and wildlife, birds, pets, and motorsport needing fast AI autofocus.

What do owners complain about?

The most-cited downside of the Osmo Pocket 3 is getting good-looking footage takes careful lighting, settings, and grading, and some owners struggle with blues and shadows. For the a6700, it's overheats during high frame-rate video.