Real owners lean toward the Garmin Forerunner 970: 68% of 75 owners recommend it, vs 55% of 56 for the Vivoactive 5.
Verdicts aggregated from Reddit, enthusiast forums, and YouTube owner comments — affiliate reviews excluded. Sample sizes differ; judge accordingly. How we score
“I'm very happy with my vivoactive 4 and will likely ask for the vivoactive 5 for Christmas.”— @tinwhiskerSC on YouTube
“This watch seems like amazing value and a great choice for the more casually gym-go'er/runner/moderately active person”— @martinjrgensen8377 on YouTube
“So disappointed they removed Stairs. I feel like I need to stick with the Vivoactive 4 for this reason.”— @dianacrabtree6546 on YouTube
Real owners lean toward the Garmin Forerunner 970: 68% of 75 owners recommend it, vs 55% of 56 for the Vivoactive 5.
Owners point the Garmin Forerunner 970 at runners wanting a lightweight, full-featured GPS watch, and small-wrist users needing a thin, comfortable watch.
Owners point the Vivoactive 5 at casual gym-goers and moderately active people wanting a budget-friendly Garmin, and non-tech-savvy buyers who want an easy, simple smartwatch experience.
The most-cited downside of the Garmin Forerunner 970 is ghost touches and an oversensitive touchscreen, sometimes unusable until disabled. For the Vivoactive 5, it's removed altimeter/barometer and stair-climb tracking that were present on the Vivoactive 4, disappointing upgraders.