βThe differences are very small. I only noticed a slight difference in the mic preamp test, but nothing beyond that.β

46% of 39 verified owners recommend the Universal Audio Apollo Twin X, based on real owner verdicts aggregated from Reddit, enthusiast forums, and YouTube.
Affiliate blogs here say 100% recommend, while the owner-based score is 46%. They earn a commission on every sale β so we show them for transparency but never let them move the score.
The headline score reflects owners (Reddit, enthusiast forums), independent lab tests, blogs with no affiliate links, and YouTube owner-comments when they line up with owners. YouTube and Affiliate blogs are shown for perspective but kept out here β hover the i for why.
Synthesized from what Universal Audio Apollo Twin X owners say β not a spec sheet.
Retailers' own star averages, for comparison β separate from our vetted owner-verdict score above.
βThe differences are very small. I only noticed a slight difference in the mic preamp test, but nothing beyond that.β
βHonestly, audio quality improvement from gen 1 to 2 isn't enough to justify an upgrade IMO.β
βI recommend the Apollo twin x duo to people who are on a tight budget too because they can actually afford itβ
βAnother cool thing about the Apollo is you can print the dry AND wet signalβ
βNot worth upgrading. Gen1 is still π₯β
βJust sold my uad equipment and went for rme. Couldn't be happier.β
βGen 2 sounds brighter, but a simple EQ curve would get you there in a minute, so if you already have Gen 1 dont feel like youre missing outβ
βIt's frankly a clumsy workflow, and the best plugins in the world don't make it worthwhile.β
βOf course, the Apollo x4 is better, but only necessary for professionalsβ
βGood to know the Scarlett is so good for such an affordable price! I love my Scarlett 2i2 3rd Gen.β
βUA needs to upgrade the whole DSP engine it's simply ripping people off with that lack of power for the price you pay.β
β$1,200 for the X6 is probably the best money spent in Pro audio at the moment.β
βThe quality of the gen2 sounds like it's getting closer to conversion I have with my apogee but imo apogee is still king in that departmentβ
βas an apollo owner the apogee symphony is like 10 times betterβ
βthis thing is a absolute beast. I recommend everyone to consider buying this instead of any Scarlett. the plugins that come with it are insaneβ
βUAD is synonym for overprice, especially in 2024β
βWow this is more difference in quality than I was expecting, even just listening on my iPhone.β
βThe only way to understand if the Gen2 is better is to do a real test, in ABX and perfectly level matched.β
βIt's a boat anchor now because it's TB2 all the plugins and the cost of the unit has been a complete waste of money.β
βI would say except the preamps, which to me on 1st gen they sound much better and natural, even though not as clean I feel they sit better in this mix example - the 2nd gen seems to excel in all the other areas.β
βThe difference really was night and day when I upgraded to my UAD Apollo X Twin.β
βI finally get confirmation that the Apollo (Gen 1) sounds a bit muddy. I've always preferred my RME AD/DA.β
βdont know why but 1st gen voc is so soothingβ
βPersonally i like the sound of gen 1.β
Practical notes owners raise β setup, quirks, and issues to watch for. They don't say whether the person likes the product, so they're not counted in the score, but they inform the pros, cons, and who it's for.
βI have a badass AMD CPU in my PC but when I bought my Universal Audio Apollo Twin X audio interface, I realized it needed a Thunderbolt 3 port to work and soon after realized that thunderbolt is an Intel thing so AMD PCs are almost completely out of luck.β